Is it feasible to be 100% objective while leading people?
What does objectivity really mean in this context? Is it an abstract concept or can it be realistically achieved? Especially, in leadership the question is whether it can be entirely maintained? ? Objectivity is the ability to maintain a realistic perspective and keep personal biases to a minimum. Sounds easy? Nothing of the sort!
Have you ever received feedback from your co-workers suggesting you are subjective in managing people, budget decisions or other areas. Perhaps, they have pointed out that you are far quicker in making your mind in one context while remaining a bit more hesitant when it comes to another. I receive such feedback occasionally and it makes me wonder: “is it even possible to be 100% objective when it comes to people? Human nature is inherently influenced by emotions, experiences, and unconscious biases. Our feelings are an innate part of who we are. Sometimes we make an immediate connection with a person and the flow is instant while with others the connection never forms. Striving for complete objectivity might be an unattainable goal, but (an important “but”) it’s crucial to aim for a minimum standard of fairness. Ignoring the importance of objectivity can lead to disparities in treatment, decreased trust and a dysfunctional work environment.
So, let me admit what exactly hinders my objectivity? Upon my reflection, I find three aspects: stereotypes, personal preferences and external opinions.
Stereotypes: preconceived notions about individuals based on factors such as gender, age, style of dress which in some way represents personality. My personal preferences to those who share similar interests, passions or sense of humor. Lastly, would be what the others say about the person which makes me feel positive or negative about the person, right from the start.
If we are aware of our weaknesses in this area, how do we manage people, taking all of the above into account? Here is, what I do.
I strive to be patient when faced with a conflict or a difficult decision, I take my time before reacting. Objective leaders are shown to have the ability to take a minute, reflect on their impulses, and temper their responses to be fair and even-handed. I try to consider all the available information. For example, many interpersonal issues occur when one individual interprets the intentions or motivations of another. Instead of attempting these interpretations, leaders should consider the possibilities, such as the context in which the situation occurs or possible alternative explanations to their biases. I try to be facts and figures oriented. One of the easiest ways to avoid acting on your biases is to use hard data which helps take a more balanced perspective.
Leaders who are objective avoid using their own judgments and interpretations. They rely on facts or data instead. When they consult decisions, they do so with several people instead of just one. As a result even when making challenging and unpopular decisions, they are met with trust and commitment. This is essential for effective leadership and navigating the business further.
Sounds straightforward, but in reality, maintaining objectivity comes a lot harder particularly when dealing with people. Answering the main question: Is it feasible to be 100% objective while leading people, my answer would be no, it is not. However, I keep telling myself that each successive failure brings me closer to perfection in this subject! So, keep calm and keep striving for fairness!
